Why You Need Better Terms & Conditions – 80 % Template Rule

Contract Templates and Terms & Conditions (T&Cs) are more than a legal formality. As we always say: “Don’t underestimate the importance of contracts – including Terms and Conditions”. Contracts are the basis of all business you do with your customers and suppliers. They set the foundation for how you operate, protect your business from disputes and build trust with clients. Yet many companies struggle to streamline their contracts and end up juggling a mess of documents. One way to simplify—and speed up—your contract workflow is by adopting the 80% Template Rule. This means that you should aim for having contract standards (contract templates) of at least 80% of the contracts you sign.

This principle states that around 80% of your agreements can rely on standardized templates, while 20% remain flexible for high-value or complex deals. In this article ‘Why You Need Better Terms & Conditions – 80 % Template Rule’, we’ll explore how this approach strikes the perfect balance between efficiency and adaptability, saving you time and money without compromising on legal safeguards. It is part of our 9 practical solutions to solve Contract Standards that Fail, see our article on this here and our Linkedin post on this subject.

---

What We Will Cover

1. Understanding the 80/20 Template Ratio Rule
2. Deviations from the 80/20 Rule: When Standardization Needs Adjusting
3. Strategic Advantages of Contract Template Standardization
4. How Terms & Conditions Fit into the 80% Model
5. Suggested Set-Up for Standard Templates
6. Examples of the 80/20 Rule in Action
7. Applying the 80% Rule Beyond Sales & Procurement
8. Conclusion: Finding the Ideal Contract Balance

---

1. Understanding the 80/20 Template Ratio Rule

Defining the 80/20 Balance

The 80/20 Template Rule suggests that about 80% of your contracts—often NDAs, routine purchase orders, and standard service agreements—can be effectively managed using pre-approved templates. These documents share consistent language, key legal protections, and known risk parameters.

The remaining 20% represents more complex or strategic agreements requiring extra customization. This might include multi-year government contracts with compliance mandates or large-scale software licenses where intellectual property rights need special attention.

Why 80%? Most deals share similar terms and risk profiles, so standardizing them eliminates tedious drafting, ensures legal consistency, and accelerates negotiations.

Our Recommendation

We advise clients – especially in tech and service-focused industries – to create shorter T&Cs for everyday deals (the 80%), while reserving longer, more detailed contracts for enterprise-level customers or specialized projects (the 20%).

It is no surprise that major companies like Microsoft, AWS, Booking.com, Salesforce, and ServiceNow follow a similar playbook. Their user agreements are concise and straightforward, but when a large corporation with unique needs comes along, they switch to a more comprehensive legal framework.

In this article we focus on Sales & Procurement Contracts, but we also recommend to improve your templates of other contracts or legal documentation, like:

• Confidentiality Agreement (NDAs)
• Employment Contracts and Consultancy / Contractor Agreements.
• Corporate Documents like Board and Shareholders Resolutions.

Training Sales and Procurement Teams

It is imperative to train your Sales and Procurement teams to use your own templates as much as possible. While it might feel easier to cave in and work off a counterparty’s contract, that typically leads to inconsistent terms, lengthier negotiations, and higher legal risks. Teaching your teams good negotiation skills and emphasizing the benefits of sticking to your standardized documents will:

• Preserve the efficiency gains from the 80/20 approach
• Reinforce consistent legal protections across deals
• Minimize back-and-forth revisions that slow down transactions

Admittedly, this isn’t always easy. But the payoff in faster deal cycles and fewer legal snags more than justifies the effort spent on training.

2. Deviations from the 80/20 Rule: When Standardization Needs Adjusting

Industry-Specific Variations

• Tech & SaaS Companies:
  Subscription-based models often push standardization above 80%. Many SaaS agreements share the same billing cycles, uptime commitments, and data protection clauses.
• Bespoke or Regulated Sectors:
  Construction, healthcare, and government-related projects can require detailed specifications and stringent compliance checks. Consequently, more contracts need unique clauses, tipping the balance closer to 70/30 or 60/40.

Finding Your Ideal Ratio

Each business has its own risk tolerance, product complexity, and regulatory pressures. Some firms can standardize a higher percentage of deals, while others need more customization. Staying alert to market changes and evolving client needs will guide you on when to adjust your ratio.

3. Strategic Advantages of Contract Template Standardization

Cost Efficiency & Risk Mitigation

• Lower Legal Costs: Less time drafting unique clauses for every contract.
• Unified Risk Controls: A single vetted template helps avoid oversights like missing indemnity or outdated compliance provisions.

Example: A mid-sized tech firm standardized all routine SaaS contracts. They cut legal spending by 30% and reduced negotiation timelines, thanks to well-vetted core terms.

Strengthening Business Relationships

• Transparency & Trust: Straightforward T&Cs reassure clients there are no hidden pitfalls.
• Faster Onboarding: Routine deals finalize more swiftly, giving your team more time to foster the client relationship itself.

Example: An e-commerce retailer merged shipping, returns, and warranty policies into one Terms & Conditions document. Customers found it simpler to review, boosting repeat purchases.

Resource Optimization

• Reduced Bottlenecks: Standard approvals mean fewer contracts clogging Legal’s inbox.
• Empowered Teams: Sales and procurement can self-manage standard deals without waiting on constant legal oversight.

Example: A global logistics company unified its supply-chain terms. Roughly 80% of vendor contracts sailed through automatically, letting the legal team focus on high-stakes negotiations.

Competitive Edge for High-Value Negotiations

• Tailored Attention: By freeing up resources on routine deals, your legal experts can concentrate on mission-critical contracts.
• Scalability: A well-structured template system handles more deals with minimal friction.

Example: A pharmaceutical firm maintained standard T&Cs for routine supply arrangements, leaving more time for specialized contracts requiring complex compliance clauses (e.g., for clinical trials).

4. How Terms & Conditions Fit into the 80% Model

T&Cs typically address recurring elements: payment schedules, liability limits, intellectual property, confidentiality, and dispute resolution. Since these components recur in most contracts, T&Cs are prime candidates for template-based management.

Shorter T&Cs work well for your mass-market or smaller deals, covering the essentials but skipping excessive detail. Larger or high-stakes deals often need additional clauses—such as robust termination rights, performance metrics, or compliance with specific regional laws. This flexible approach preserves efficiency for typical deals while offering room for customization when the stakes are high.

In the next paragraph we will explain what kind of T&Cs are suggested and which set-up works best.

5. Suggested Set-Up for Standard Templates

A highly effective way to organize your standard T&Cs is by establishing a Master Services Agreement (MSA) that references related documents—like a Data Processing Agreement (DPA), AI Terms, or specific policies such as a Data Deletion Policy. A crucial part of this architecture is having an Order Form that seamlessly ties everything together.

• MSA: Lays out overarching legal terms (liability limits, governing law, dispute resolution).
• Referenced Docs: DPA, AI Terms, or other policies that expand on specific obligations (e.g., how data must be handled or deleted).
• Order Form: Serves as the front-facing commercial document where you list products, services, or solutions (with pricing and timelines). This form explicitly refers back to the MSA and other relevant documents.

This setup works perfectly for Tech, Marketing, and Renewable Energy (like wind-turbine contracts). For smaller deals, you might rely on a concise MSA and a single-page Order Form. For major contracts with enterprise clients or larger wind-turbine installations, you can attach more detailed policies or custom clauses. Either way, your commercial process runs more smoothly because every party understands how each document fits together.

6. Examples of the 80/20 Rule in Action

SaaS Subscription Services

A CRM software startup realized nearly all its contracts centered on monthly billing, data privacy, and uptime guarantees. They folded these key elements into a master SaaS agreement template. Only enterprise-level customers needed additional clauses for advanced reporting features or custom security provisions. Once implemented, the company was able to reduce the average negotiation time from 2,5 month to 3 weeks.

Construtech SaaS Business

A SaaS provider offering project management tools to construction companies struggled with too many deviations. Each Order Form and set of T&Cs looked different, confusing potential customers and slowing down deal cycles. By adopting a single, streamlined template for 80% of contracts—focusing on recurring terms like data hosting, monthly billing, and software uptime—they cut drafting time in half. Only complex enterprise deals demanded the extra 20% customization, freeing up Legal to handle bigger clients more effectively.

Renewable Energy Maintenance Contracts

A wind-turbine services firm had been too lenient in accepting external contracts, leading to inconsistent obligations and renewal terms. Small deals would still get bogged down in counterparty paperwork. After training their Sales and Procurement teams to use the internal template for routine maintenance agreements, they introduced a short-form contract for smaller deals and a longer form for large-scale, multi-year engagements. This switch sped up negotiations, saw more deals closed per quarter, and cut the legal team’s workload on repetitive contract reviews.

Manufacturing & Supply Chain

A consumer electronics manufacturer was dealing with countless supplier agreements. By centralizing payment terms, quality standards, and delivery timelines into a uniform T&Cs document, they standardized 80% of the vendor contracts. Specialized orders—like cutting-edge chipsets—fell into the 20% that needed bespoke clauses.

7. Applying the 80% Rule Beyond Sales & Procurement

Although this article focuses on Sales & Procurement Contracts, the 80% Template Rule can also make a big impact on other types of legal documents, including:

NDAs (Confidentiality Agreements)

NDAs are the prime example of commercial documents that should take the least time to negotiate and sign. Great templates, including playbooks will be a great help when reducing timelines to finalize NDAs.

Employment Contracts

Instead of creating a new agreement from scratch for every new hire, build a standardized template addressing core terms like job role, compensation, confidentiality, and restrictive covenants. Tailor only where specific senior-level or specialized positions call for it.

Consultancy/Contractor Agreements

For external consultants or freelance contractors, a streamlined template can outline payment terms, scope of work, and intellectual property rights. Unique projects involving complex deliverables may need additional clauses, but many routine engagements can run on the same template.

Corporate Documents

Board Resolutions

Repeated decisions, like approving annual budgets or routine transactions, can follow a simple, standardized structure.

Shareholders’ Resolutions

Common shareholder actions (e.g., reappointing directors, authorizing certain business activities) often don’t need a custom form each time.

Other Governance Documents

Power of Attorney templates for the company.

Opportunities for consistency

Using the 80/20 principle for these areas can save you time and help maintain consistency across all your legal documentation, not just in sales or procurement. By standardizing the bulk of your corporate and employment agreements, you minimize repetitive legal work and preserve specialized attention for pivotal, high-risk decisions or hiring situations.

Conclusion: Finding the Ideal Contract Balance

Mastering the 80% Template Rule and focusing on standards isn’t about cutting corners. It’s about optimizing contract management to align with your overarching business goals. By maintaining shorter T&Cs for routine deals, you reduce negotiation time and safeguard legal consistency. You then keep a 20% buffer for the truly important or complex agreements, ensuring they get the personalized attention they deserve.

Key Takeaway: Standardize where you can, customize where you must. The 80% Template Rule provides a proven roadmap for managing a high volume of similar contracts while preserving the flexibility to address unique or high-stakes scenarios. By training your Sales and Procurement teams to champion your own templates, you maintain control, cut legal overhead and close deals faster. As we have seen in many companies, this will give you a competitive advantage.

Contact us

If you are ready to transform your contracts, we’re here to help. Whether your primary focus is implementing more Templates or the next step how to leverage Tech & AI, every organization can benefit from more streamlined, flexible, and secure contracts. For further guidance on improving contract templates, managing negotiations, and optimizing related processes, reach out via lowa@amstlegal.com or book an appointment with Robby Reggers here.